Really Sciency

Visit my other blog 'Really Sciency' looking at Climate Science and its portrayal, misrepresentation and denial in the media.

Sunday, 5 December 2010

Where will you go when you die? Heaven or Hell?


I used to be a very devout Christian, but as I gained more knowledge about the world I started to question my faith and the more questions I ask the less satisfactory answers I got. I gradually turned against organised religion and became agnostic but still really believing there must be 'something'. About 5 years ago I released I was a true atheist and it came as a revelation, if you excuse the pun. I feel much happier in myself having got rid of all my doubts, almost like becoming a Christian in the first place. But it was also a little scary knowing there is no afterlife.

That was a bitter pill for me to swallow, but I consoled myself with the fact that there was no hell either, so I couldn't end up there!



My father used to always say he didn't care if he went to heaven or hell. He had friends in both places! If such places do exist, and I can’t prove they don’t, then so do I.

Atheists want to ban religious education in schools...

... or so many theists would claim,  and some non believers might, but not me and not some of the most vocal atheists like Dawkins. But any religious indoctrination is schools should be banned.



There should be more religious education in school rather than less. This will get rid of the indoctrination of the idea that there is one true religion and allow a balance of opinion. Children will not necessarily believe they have to have the beliefs of their families. Atheism has nothing to fear from knowledge of religion, but everyone will have fears if religious ideas become laws and commandments that all must follow regardless of the ethics of them.

Obviously it is a parent’s duty to equip their children for survival in the world and that means educating them. This is done by our school system at least in part. Some children may not like it but are not responsible enough to make up their own minds about it.

Is teaching facts and imparting information including religious studies indoctrination? Of course not. Most schools teach subjects that are well established through facts and research. Indoctrination is completely different and can occur in faith schools as well as home life. Indoctrination is instruction in the fundamentals of a system of belief such as a religion. This is making children believe in the un-provable and usually exclusively, i.e. ‘This is the one and only true church’. It is this indoctrination that Dawkins refered too as, perhaps too emotively, child abuse. Indoctrination entrenches beliefs, and encourages irrational thought. Children grow up distrusting, even hating those of a different sect or belief with no room to compromise because ‘god has given them the right’.

But education is more than learning facts. Children need to be able to integrate into society so they will learn the values and culture biased toward the society they are most likely to be in. Britons learn British history for example but not necessarily Hawaiian.

Is teaching children about current affairs and healthy eating indoctrination in the truest sense? The government in power may put their spin on things but these subjects can be studied through the media where policy is often openly criticized. Religious indoctrination is a lot different. Understanding other sects’ points of view is normally discouraged and there may be punishments and penalties for not believing or conforming.

Education in religion is vital, but if it is unbalanced it can lapse into indoctrination. My children have went to a faith school because it has an excellent academic record. I do not think they indoctrinate to a point that would worry me and they have me ensuring a balanced view, I do not preach non belief to them, it is enough for them to know I do not believe and they will make up their owns minds eventually. But there are other faith schools that are not Christian. I'm sure most of these are fine, but some have come under criticism for their fundamental views. What type of adults could their most successful pupils, (in the schools eyes),  make?

Harry Potter Burnt at the Stake by the Witch Finder General

I'm hoping to take my kids to the latest instalment of the Harry Potter, film series. The books have been around our house for years.
And for years now religious nutjobs have been banning and burning them. I accept that parents have a responsibility to ensure what their children see and read are appropriate so should restrict their children's reading and viewing but banning and burning books is medieval censorship.

This successful series of challenging children's / adult books has brought so many to reading and literacy that in my book, if you excuse the pun, it can only be a good thing. But there seems to be a growing trend of children's fiction being deemed evil because of the challenging themes, Now with the Potter series coming to a close I do hope that authors will continue to publish books that challenge young minds and hope that parents encourage their reading and discussion.

Friday, 3 December 2010

Another Creationist Theme Park.



I know of many creationists theme parks / museums, they are springing up all over including one in Cincinnati in the US, and ones in Portsmouth and Bristol England. Now I hear that the Cincinnati is going to be a theme park called Ark Encounter opening in 2014.

For people in this day and age to be allowed to expose their children to such anti-scientific misinformation is disgusting and this type of indoctrination should be illegal, but how can you convince people of that when they think the Flintstones is a reality show?

Wednesday, 1 December 2010

Pope supports GM!

I'm not sure what has been going on at the Vatican recently. First we had a statement allowing the use of condoms to prevent infection - not just to protect men apparently - and now we hear that it is OK for scientists to genetically modify life.

It does just mention crops to be fair, but since there has already been fish genes used in tomatoes I'm not sure where priests will draw the line or how they could be qualified to.

HOW TO BE A SCEPTIC - Part One

Cherry Picking

“Temperatures in Alaska have plummeted 2.5 degrees since 2004.”

You should always be sceptical of comments like this. You should still be sceptical of comments that say ‘decade’ or ‘century’ but if you see a specific year chosen, a true sceptic should realise that this is likely to be a cherry pick to spread misinformation.
So true sceptics should look at other, perhaps adjacent years to confirm how true the statement stands up. So for example, if it doesn’t hold up for 2000 it should be dismissed for nonsense.

I leave any true sceptics to check that much out for themselves.