Really Sciency

Visit my other blog 'Really Sciency' looking at Climate Science and its portrayal, misrepresentation and denial in the media.

Tuesday, 25 January 2011

How Moses got the 10 Commandments



 
God went to the Arabs and said,
"I have Commandments for you that will make your lives better."

The Arabs asked, "What are Commandments?"
And the Lord said, "They are rules for living."

"Can you give us an example?"

"Thou shall not kill."

"Not kill? We're not interested."


 
So He went to the Blacks and said, "I have Commandments."

The Blacks wanted an example, and the Lord said,
"Honor thy Father and Mother."

"Father? We don't know who our fathers are. We're not interested."

Then He went to the Mexicans and said,
"I have Commandments."

The Mexicans also wanted an example, and the Lord said "Thou shall not steal."

"Not steal? We're not interested."

Then He went to the French and said,
"I have Commandments."

The French too wanted an example and the Lord said, "Thou shall not commit adultery."

"Not commit adultery? We're not interested."

Finally, He went to the Jews and said,
"I have Commandments."

"Commandments?" They said, "How much are they?"

"They're free."

"We'll take 10."


There that should offend just about everybody.

Monday, 24 January 2011

Enough is Enough!


Not really new News but the Australian Academy of Science strike out "Enough is enough”



"The academy cannot issue a statement without consulting its 400 fellows, who happen to be Australia's most respected scientists. So when it comes out swinging, it's hard for the sceptics to just dismiss them.

What they're saying is "Enough is enough": they're defending the science, citing the deep certainty and the less deep uncertainty. In doing so, they're also delivering a body blow to self-appointed 'experts' who trivialise, misunderstand or just plain twist the data."

Friday, 21 January 2011

Un-Education Maintenance Allowance


When my son was at college he used to moan that many of the other students got EMA and he didn't qualify, but these students were from the poorest areas and many would simply have not been able to go to further education.

To say students should all get part time jobs, (my son fortunately did), is to assume that suitable jobs are available for everyone who needs them. Also £10 - £30 is hardly enough for kids to live it up and most will still work if they can get it.

The money that was allocated to the EMA was fairly insignificant in the big scheme of government spending but made a big difference to those that got it. David Cameron said the money would be better targeted helping the poor but failed to say how it was to be spent, if at at all. If they wanted to help poorer people all they had to do was to lower the income limit for the households.

With the news that more young people are now unemployed this is going to aggravate the situation. Do we really want more young people with less education unemployed on our streets?

Wednesday, 19 January 2011

Atheists in denial.


It is very disheartening when you see atheists being as dogmatic as any god botherer. A recent example of this is on the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science, with a report on a scientific paper on sea level rise.

Many of the comments under this are from people –  I presume they are almost exclusively non-believers – who reject science and the idea of man made warming even though it is supported by many lines of independent evidence. This seems to happen on any global warming related item.


To be honest I don’t think such people are true atheists at all because it seems that they have just substituted one dogmatic belief in gods for another belief that there are no gods, rather than having no belief in gods. This may appear to be a subtle difference but a very important one.

I like to think that my own non-belief is a result of critical thinking and only accepting credible evidence to inform my decision. Likewise I don’t believe in evolution because unlike creationists I don’t have to believe something. I just have to accept the science to accept evolution. Man made global warming is no different, I accept the supporting science from many scientific disciplines, the knowledge that the basic physics would be fundamentally wrong if an increase in green house emissions did not cause warming and the opinion of every national academy and institute of science. What’s to believe?

On a site that is supposed to be dedicated to reason and science it is sad to see so many who reject both.

Sunday, 16 January 2011

An Islamic Car - I kid you not.



A few years ago the Malaysian carmaker Proton announced plans to develop an "Islamic car", designed for Muslim motorists. I’m not sure if it has exploded onto the market yet or how popular it is selling if it is, but I’m sure it will go like a bomb.

According to the report the car could boast special features like a compass pointing to Mecca, (I bet Paddy Power isn’t too pleased), and a dedicated space to keep a copy of the Koran and a headscarf.

To continue this inappropriate stereotyping, it could also have a prayer mat, stop automatically at prayer time and refuse petrol or oil during Ramadan and would be fuelled by a mistaken belief that the other cars want to conquer it.

The ladies version could have two slits instead of a windscreen but only if it is used in a country that allows women to drive at all.

What's next - a mass produced Pope Mobile for Roman Catholics?

What type of 'Faith' vehicle would you like to see and what features should it have?

Saturday, 15 January 2011

Natural selection


 Most people, except probably the mis-educated or ignorant, accept that the process of natural selection, the main driver of evolution, exists. But how did it begin?

It isn’t very satisfying to just say, "So natural selection just happened”.

I believe the idea of natural selection has become a bit of a tautology; whatever is better at surviving and reproducing, survives and reproduces more than whatever isn't as good at surviving and reproducing. 


Once you have replicators and some source of variation, natural selection has to happen. The very scientifically interesting question is how the first replicators arose.

It is scientifically interesting because there are no definitive answers. There are plenty of hypotheses, but evidence about what actually happened is (understandably) difficult to come by (it is highly unlikely that they would have left physical traces).

So any anti-evolutionist will now jump in and ask; How did life come into existence if not by chance?

The concept of chance needs careful handling, as it's not straightforward. If you toss a coin over and over again indefinitely, you will eventually get a run of ten heads. Does that happen by chance, given that it's inevitable?

Some scenarios have a vast number of possible outcomes. Each one of them is highly unlikely, but one of them is going to happen. Whichever one it is, will it be reasonable to say after the event that the winning outcome is too unlikely to have happened by chance? To put it another way, the chances of winning the lottery are remote, but people win it all the time.

The concept of life also needs careful handling. It's not necessarily the case that there has to be a clear division between life and non-life. Purely chemical replicators exist. There could have been many intermediate stages that can't be classified by the usual definitions. Evolution by natural selection doesn't require life as we know it; it only needs replication and selection of some kind to be going on. 

Life as we know it could have evolved in a system which in some way met the requirements for evolution without containing anything that we'd recognise as a living organism.

Atheist Testimony


Giving a religious testimony of faith is quite a common practice in church meetings and gatherings especially in some Christian circles. At the risk of putting myself in the firing line I thought I would give mine as a non-believer as sincerely as possible.


It may help other atheists/non-believers, who perhaps never have had faith, to understand what it’s like and also show those of faith, even though it is impossible for them to realise it now, that life can be just as fulfilling without believing in gods.

I was brought up in the Church of Ireland, being from Ireland. Religion was of quite a fundamental variety at that time and place. I became saved in my teens through attending a Christian group in my school. As a Christian I felt the power of the Holy Spirit often when worshipping and being around other Christians, or alone when praying or in contemplation. Occasionally I would get flashes of inspiration or feel humbled and filled with awe at something. The feelings of love and sense of purpose during these times were intense and I ‘knew’ my faith was taking me on the right path through life.

As an atheist I can still get these feelings but no longer attribute them to the supernatural. I can still get flashes of inspired thinking, still feel a great love for my friends and family and the feeling is exactly the same as before. There are times I can just get in the ‘zone’ psychologically and feel wonder about life and the immenseness of the cosmos. These feelings do not occur as often as they once did but then I am not actively seeking them with my ‘fix’ of worship and meetings. That is why reason now tells me that almost anyone in the right environment can have spiritual experiences, no matter what religion or none.

Am I making spiritual progress? Believe I am on the right path?

Yes very much, but I am no longer really happy with the term ‘spiritual’. I can think of no better save perhaps enlightenment? So I see a spirituality that is not related to religion or the supernatural – an inner sense of peace or contentment if that makes any sense.

It was during prayer that I felt closest to God and moved by the Holy Spirit the most. This truly defined my relationship with them. I prayed often and with others. Looking back, most prayer was about giving thanks. Of the prayers I believe were actually answers I see there were really only two types of prayer.

The first was when I asked for something that required gods’ intervention. I will not  talk about specific cases but these could be for something like a safe journey, a friend’s health or peace. Not all these prayers were answered off course and being strong in the faith I could easily find reasons why this was so. But some were answered and this gave me strong evidence in the power of prayer and the Lord. How great is it to have God help you out!

Again looking back I can see that some of my prayers were always going to be answered – it was just a matter of probabilities even when it may have seemed against the odds at the time. Some times things turned out different than I had prayed for but not in a bad way, so it was easy to see that God had answered these prayers also but in his own way. But strong in the faith as I was, probabilities and coincidence would never have occurred to me.

The second type of prayer was used when I was troubled or needed advice or guidance. These prayers it seems were always answered, certainly at the time I was the most strong in my faith. Some times during the prayer or the next morning I would just know the best course of action to take and that I had been shown this by the Holy Spirit. To have your life guided by god and having his help to make decisions was wonderful. This was absolute proof that my relationship with god was real and true.

Again in retrospect, answers to prayers of this kind may had been the most convincing but are now the most easily dismissed. Now if I have decisions to make and things to just work out I find some quiet time for contemplation and mull over the issue, or sometimes sleep on it. This is exactly what I did during prayer but I am not using an invisible friend any more. And I still get answers to all these problems but the answers I get are even better than those I got through prayer! How so?
 
Have there never been times when you knew god had provided you with a solution and you followed it? You may not even have noticed circumstances changing and when it reached its conclusion you still knew that was the way it was meant to be.
Unless it was a total disaster you would have no reason to question and even if it was, then there will always be a reason why god wanted things that way. So no matter how things turned out, I always ‘knew’ it was for the best.
 
Now I can reconsider and adapt to new knowledge about the problem in a way that would have been inconceivable before. Now I know that the decision I reached may be the best one, given what I knew, but it is not divine so may not necessarily be the best in the end. To think god gave me the answer left no room for change.

Most Christians will always see non-belief as a loss of something or at least a replacement. In one way it must be, most believers see everything that they have gained since becoming a Christian and assume that people with non-belief do not have any of this, and to not believe means the loss of it. It just isn't so.
It is more a change in attitude. I felt like I was at the start of a new journey of discovery and genuine enlightenment / rationality. Atheism is a gain not a loss. I know that it just means having no belief in gods, but I obviously did have beliefs so they were replaced with a philosophy which encompassed similar values, gave me similar and even more rewards but did not have a supernatural element to it. This philosophy is not atheism but just what personally came about by it.

So I am not making a case for atheism. I have no interest in making people lose their faith, I like to challenge belief and have my own world views challenged in return and have to rationalise them to myself by answering questions from others. It is amazing when someone asks why I think something is the way it is and I find that I have never thought about it before or had to put it into terms that others can understand.

This thread does not even touch on how I moved from Christian to atheist, but I can assure you that it just didn't happen one day. But that is another story, a long one and probably not a very interesting one at that.

Reading back through this my description all sounds a bit inadequate but it is the best I can manage. Needless to say, I have found life makes complete sense to me now and I no longer need a god to help me through my life and feel better about myself and a stronger person for it.